Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Seeking a way to tie Corporate entrepreneurship with Organizational learning

Integrating customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in organizations-in-transition: an empirical study. International Journal of Research in Marketing
The paper addresses the issue of interrelationships between market orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in the context of emerging economies. These three constructs have drawn an increasing level of interest in both marketing and management fields as organizations face challenges in a volatile environment. With a national sample of state-owned enterprises in China, the present study simultaneously tests potential relations between these structural constructs and their relationships with the organizational outcome that is reflected with marketing program dynamism. The findings of this study indicate that: (1) sampled state-owned enterprises demonstrate a higher level of changes in organizational outcome resulted from a stronger customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, or learning orientation; (2) learning orientation fully or partially mediates the impact of customer orientation and corporate entrepreneurship on outcome; (3) state-owned enterprises with foreign partnership have a higher level of customer orientation, entrepreneurship, and learning orientation; and (4) state-owned enterprises in the service sector have a higher level of customer orientation.
Liu, S., Luo, X., & Shi, Y. (2002). Integrating customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in organizations-in-transition: an empirical study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 367-382.

Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance
Contemporary organizations require a strong learning orientation to gain competitive advantage. Based on in-depth interviews with senior executives and a review of the literature, the present investigation delineates four components of learning orientation: commitment to learning, shared vision, open-mindedness, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. A framework is tested using data from a broad spectrum of US industries. Learning orientation is conceptualized as a second-order construct. Its effect on firm innovativeness, which in turn affects firm performance, is examined. The results generally support theoretical predictions, and some interesting findings emerge.
Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.

Fostering Organizational Performance: The Role of Learning and Intrapreneurship
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between individual learning, intrapreneurship, and organizational learning to create an alternative model of how learning facilitates performance in organizations. 
Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper selecting targeted scholarly works that provide support for the proposed model. 
Findings – The paper presents a model of intrapreneurial learning and performance in which the constructs of environment, individual learning, intrapreneurship, and organizational learning influence organizational performance. Intrapreneurship is a relatively recent area of exploration in which scholarly efforts have primarily focused on identifying the construct and distinguishing it from entrepreneurship. The proposed model of intrapreneurial learning and performance joins a growing number of works that explore how intrapreneurship contributes to organizational performance. It is suggested that the framework may help scholars identify potential strategies of learning that could help organizations position intrapreneurship as a vehicle for improving organizational performance. 
Originality/value – The paper postulates an original relationship among individual learning, intrapreneurship, organizational learning, environment, and organizational performance. In this framework, individual and organizational learning combine to offer a unique perspective on the link between intrapreneurship and organizational performance.
Article Type:  Conceptual paper
Keyword(s): Workplace training; Individual development; Entrepreneurialism; Organizational performance.
Molina, C., & Callahan, J. (2009). Fostering Organizational Performance: The Role of Learning and Intrapreneurship. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(5), 13.

Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) is a key ingredient for firm success. Nonetheless, an important message from past findings is that simply examining the direct effect of EO on firm performance provides an incomplete picture. Prior studies examined various internal and external factors that influence the EO–performance relationship. However, learning orientation (LO) has been a missing link in the examination of the relationship. Using data from 213 medium-to-large UK firms, this study finds that LO mediates the EO-performance relationship, and the EO–LO–performance link is stronger for prospectors than analyzers. The findings indicate that LO must be in place to maximize the effect of EO on performance, and that LO is an important dimension, along with EO, to distinguish prospectors from analyzers.
Wang, C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635-657.

Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation
This study aims to investigate the relationships between drivers of innovativeness and the mediation effects of learning orientation. A conceptual model is designed and hypotheses are constructed. In order to test the hypotheses, structural equation modeling is performed for the data collected from 333 technology-innovative small firms in South Korea. The results reveal that market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation significantly influences learning orientation, respectively. Additionally, learning orientation significantly affects innovativeness, and sequentially innovativeness has a significant effect on performance. The most notable of these is that learning orientation performs a mediating function in the relationships between market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation and innovativeness. The findings imply that managers with entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation should place much emphasis on learning orientation in order to boost innovativeness and ultimately achieve performance. Limitations include a limited number of predictors and possibility of generalizability of the results.
Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, D. (2010). Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation. Technovation, 30(1), 65-75.

1 comment:

  1. به نظر میرسد برای شکل گیری چارچوبی که بتوان در آن به این پنج مقاله فکر کنیم یا نتیجه گیری کنیم اول از همه نیاز است که به تعاریفی که از «جهت گیری کارآفرینانه» و «نوآوری» و ... ارائه می دهند توجه کنیم:
    در صفحه ۵۱۷ مقاله دوم نویسندگان تعریف هرت را برای نوآورانه بودن سازمانی در نظر می گیرند. همانطور که قبلا در حلقه بحث کردیم این سازه از جنس سازه های رفتاری (گرایش یا تمایل به پذیرش نوآوری و تغییر) است:
    "Firm innovativeness is conceptualized from two perspectives. The first views it as a behavioral variable, that is, the rate of adoption of innovations by the firm. The second views it as an organization’s willingness to change (Hurt et al, 1977)."

    Authors of third paper define the intrapreneurship and compare it with similar constructs such as entrepreneurship and creativity (in other words, construct validity of intrapreneurship).
    "First appearing in 1976, intrapreneurship has been credited with helping improve organizational performance by increasing opportunities for success when facing more complex and competitive scenarios (Amo and Kolvereid, 2005)."
    پیشنهاد میکنم ادامه این مرور ادبیات را در صفحه ۳۸۹ بخوانید.
    (Intrapreneurship ra chi tarjome mikonid dar farsi?!)

    مقاله چهارم برای تعریف جهتگیری کارآفرینانه از کارهای لامکین و دس که در حلقه بحث شد استفاده کرده و همان چهار بعد معروف را در نظر گرفته است. :
    "...several key dimensions of the construct [Entrepreneurial orientation (EO)] have emerged. Miller (1983) suggested that a firm’s degree of entrepreneurship is the extent to which it innovates, acts proactively, and takes risks. Lumpkin and Dess (1996) suggest that proactiveness and aggressiveness are, indeed, distinct dimensions, albeit closely allied to each other ... this study adopts the four dimensions of EO as market proactiveness, competitive aggressiveness, firm risk taking, and firm innovativeness."
    در صفحه ۶۳۷ می توانید توضیحات بیشتر درباره این چهار بعد را پیدا کنید. (در یک پاراگراف همه چیز را خلاصه کرده) نکته قابل توجه درباره بعد آخر یعنی نوآورانه بودن سازمانی که سازگار با تعریف مقاله دوم است:
    "This study ... defines innovativeness as 'a firm’s tendency to engage in and support new ideas, novelty, experimentation, and creative processes that may result in new products, services, or technological processes' (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996, p. 142)."

    اتفاقا مقاله پنجم (در صفحه ۶۶) به این نکته اشاره می کند که پژوهشگران نوآورانه بودن سازمانی را یک بعد جهتگیری کارآفرینانه معرفی کرده اند و برای تمایز قائل شدن بین این دو سازه (مفهوم) ها را اینگونه تعریف میکند:
    "... we adopt innovativeness in this study given that it is a fundamental source of innovation."
    و در ادامه یک حرف جالب می زند:
    "...we postulate that entrepreneurial orientation is an attitude toward a particular kind of behavior, while innovativeness is a behavior-based construct toward outcomes. From this point of view, entrepreneurial orientation can be regarded as an antecedent of innovativeness, demonstrating that both are separate constructs ... Consistent with this conceptualization, and as empirical evidence in support of ourviews, Hult et al.(2004) claim that entrepreneurial orientation consists of 2 elements—i.e. proactiveness and risk-taking—on the basis of their investigation of the relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and innovativeness."
    کدام یک پیشآیند دیگری است: نوآورانه بودن سازمانی یا جهتگیری کارآفرینانه؟ مطابق نگاه این نویسنده دومی پیش آیند اولی است:
    "H6:. Entrepreneurial orientation will positively influence innovativeness via learning orientation [p.68] ... H6 supported. [p. 72]"

    ReplyDelete